Notes 2-2-99
Question: Contrast-to-Noise = (Contrast between 2 tissues)/Noise
Suppose contrast is 1. Then, if SNR is 50:1, the noise is 0.2
Suppose image, look at SI as fxn of position.
Outside image, have noise, inside have signal plus noise.
We measure the difference between A and B, and subtract out the noise at the left. As can be easily imagined, if the noise increases, the distinction between A and B will increase.
Note: Multi-echo sequence.
90 180 180
In phase Out of Phase In Out In
Te1 = time between 90 and signal refocused by first 180
Te2 = time between 90 and signal refocused by second 180
Typical ranges from 10 - 150 msec.
New stuff for today: Spatial encoding
FT - > function of s , has both real and imaginary components
Square wave => sinc fxn
When we acquire thing in scanner, put spins in transverse plane, get signal.
Use two antenna systems, get 2 signals, both 90 out of phase. Label cosine one real, label sine one imaginary.
Our object will produce 2 signals, a real and imaginary component.
Somehow, we get twice as much data! Where is the redundancy?
Let's look at odd and even functions. Even functions => real, odd => all imaginary
f(x) = E(f(x)) + O(f(x))
E(x) = E(-x)
O(x)=-O(-x)
Any function => unique even and odd parts.
E(x) = (f(x)+f(-x))/2
O(x) = (f(x)-f(-x))/2
Let f(x) = E(x) + O(x)
If f(x) even, F(s) all real
If f(x) odd, F(s) all imaginary
If f(x) combo, F(s) complex
For a real fxn, the real part of FT is even.
The imaginary part of FT is odd.
The redundancy turns out to be that k-space is Hermitian for real images, that is, F(-s) = complex conjugate of F(s).
Hence, we need only listen to signal for 1/2 time to make a complete image.
Do a gradient echo sequence, put only positive x-gradient (assume ideal gradients), get right 1/2 of k-space.
Why do this? Less time.
Note te is time to zero-point in k-space.
Recall k-space: Time between successive lines, tr. Total imaging time tr*# lines.
Can cut imaging time in half!
Can also get very low te's! (Because contrast is determined by center of k-space.)
Note, can only use this trick once.
Now, fast imaging:
Rapid acquisiton w/ refocused echoes (RARE). Fast-spin echo (FSE). Multi-echo sequence: Put 180's very close together (5-10 msec) so T2 differences small.
Note, apply our dephasing lobe positively before 180, equivalent to negative gradient after pulse.
Apply phase encoding w/ +/-.
Can do this multiple times.
Advantage: timing.
Limits, T1 of tissue.
Problem, lose signal w/ each successive echo.
HW Question: Use for T1 or T2 contrast?
Say 16 lines of k-space. Use conjugate symmetry so only 8.
Say use double FSE. Get cyclic intensity variation. Result in intensity w/ bright point in image.
They do not try to correct, but do every 4 lines interlaced so reduction smooth.
Spatial frequency
What frequencies are we talking about?
Say grad 4000Hz/cm. See dephasing for big sphere. Don't see it for a point.
So, center of raw data space has low-spatial frequencies. Edges give details (high spatial frequencies). Things fall off rapidly as you go to the outer edges of k-space.
Back to FSE:
Possible to modulate contrast by determining where center of k-space lies.
Te(effective) = time from 90 to center of k-space
Handwave: Center of k-space determines contrast. Hence definition of effective te.
All T2s use FSE so faster. However, contrast behavior is not simple T2 weighted. Have spatially dependent contrast. Low-spatial frequency = >te contrast. High-frequency => te+/- something contrast. Minimize cycling of lines by interleaving.
Diffusion, will look at later.
Reality: Don't have perfect gradients.
How make gradient? Spool of wire, run e- current, produce b-field linear w/ position. Coils have inductance. Stores energy in B-field that counteracts tendency to change current. Resist changes in current measured by L, inductance. V = LdI/dt = EMF which counteracts. To get 0 ramp time, need infinite V.
Typically, we put constant voltage, so current changes linearly. Get it in .2 to 0.5 msec.
Regarding k-space, we have to make sure the gradient-time product results in even divisions so we get linear sampling of k-space.
For EPI this is very important, because we can sample unevenly in time.
HW question: Do we put on the slice select gradient during the 180? Why or why not?